Skip to Main Content

JRP: Kennedy-Farrell 2024: Home

HELPFUL INFORMATION: Read below!

Find below links to the databases we reviewed in class that will likely be helpful with this project.  You will also find all parts of the Evanston Revive Project that Mr. Kennedy-Farrell has shared with you.  You will need to scroll down for some parts of the assignment.

Databases Shown in Class

Databases shown in class:

1. Opposing Viewpoints

2. UMI / Proquest

3. SIRS Researcher

 

 

 

 

 

Assignment

Tonight’s HW: 

  1. Choose two of the controversial social issues listed below, and complete the “question-asking activity” to write at least 10 questions for each of the two issues (20+ questions total). 

  2. Label all of your questions as either “open” or “closed” ended.

  3. Prioritize 2-3 “most important questions” from each list, and identify them somehow, by highlighting them or writing them separately.

  4. Submit your work on Google Classroom or bring it with you on paper tomorrow.

 

(Some Topics Brainstormed in Class)

Sports and concussion

Sports and athletes (What metrics determine greatest in a sport for us? Jordan/LeBron, etc.

Death penalty

Right to bear arms

NCAA paying athletes

Immigration

Abortion rights

Politics and there being less of a middle ground today

Obesity . . . 

Animal Rights

Schools & Metal Detectors

College loan forgiveness

For-profit prisons

College Access

Military and Artificial Intelligence

Military

Military and recruiting

Child support

U.S. companies/privacy and AI

Religious tax exemptions

Politics and politicians

Foster care system

Child welfare system

Vaccines

Inflation

The economy

Incarceration rates

Area 51

Racial profiling

How do judge fame or greatness in our country? How is it related to power and accountability?  (Jeffrey Epstein, Michael Jackson, etc.)

Child labor

Free speech/hate speech

Police violence

Poverty

Gender equality

Pay gap

Public welfare

Wealth gap

Racial discrimination

LGBTQ+ rights

AI and education

Annotated Bibliography 101

 

An annotated bibliography is an informative list of the sources that you used for your project. It is made up of MLA citations, summaries, and analyses.  The reason for making an annotated bibliography is to be sure that the sources you are using for your project are varied, reliable, and informative. A good annotated bibliography touches on the following areas/points:

 

  1. Summary of the source.

  2. Credibility of the source and its author.

  3. Relevance of the source to your topic.

 

For your annotated bibliography, you need to include at least seven sources. If you’ve done the notecards on Noodle Tools, then you’ve done most of the work already. These sources should be the same ones that you will quote in your JRP.

 

*Remember that you need at least TWO PRIMARY SOURCES, such as letters, manuscripts, diaries, journals, statistics, graphs, charts, maps, speeches, interviews, documents produced by government agencies, photographs, audio or video recordings, etc.

*More than half of your sources need to have authors listed.

 

Directions (also explained in the attached video).

 

  1. On Noodle Tools, click on the “eye” in the top right corner and make sure you check “notecards” in order to show the notecards.

  1. On Noodle Tools, use CTRL-C to copy what you wrote on your notecard for “paraphrase” and what you wrote for “My Ideas.”

 

  1. Paste this into the “annotation” part of that same source by clicking on the three dots and then “Edit”.

 

  1. Scroll down to find the “annotation” part of the source and use “CTRL-V” to paste what you got from the notecard into the annotation.

  1. Get rid of all of the spaces between the “paraphrase” and the “My Ideas” section that you copied and pasted. Make it all one paragraph. If necessary, write more about the credibility of the source. Is it current (2018 or even more recent)? Is it from a respected news agency or publisher? Is the author listed, and does that author have any credibility? Does it seem biased?  None of these are deal-breakers on their own, but together they may be.

  1. Don’t forget to click “Save”.

  2. Repeat steps 2-5 for all seven of your sources. Click “Save” each time.

  3. When you’re finished with all seven sources, use Noodle Tools to export your completed annotated bibliography to a Google Doc. First, click on the print/export icon on the top of the list of sources and choose “Formatting Options”.

  1.   Make sure you set all of the formatting options to be as you see in this image. The title should be “Annotated Bibliography,” you should include your last name where it asks for it, and you should choose “citations AND annotations”. 

  1.  Click on the “Print/Export” icon again and this time, instead of formatting options, choose “Print/Export to Google Docs” and it will do the rest for you!

 

Sample: You don’t need to use different colors. That’s just to show the three parts: summary, credibility, and relevance.

 

Annotated Bibliography

 

Frauenheim, Ed. “Stop Reading This Headline and Get Back to Work.” CNET

  News.com. CNET Networks, 11 July 2005. Web. 17 Feb. 2006. (source

citation).     The author examines the results of a study of ten thousand employees conducted by America Online and Salary.com, which found that the Internet was the most popular means of wasting time at work. Frauenheim notes that the extra time spent surfing the Internet is costing companies an estimated $759 billion a year but also quotes the senior vice president at Salary.com and a director at America Online, who argue that employee Internet use actually increases productivity and creativity in the workplace. Frauenheim suggests that the increase in personal Internet use at work might result from a longer average workday and that use of the Internet has made employees more efficient, giving them more free time to waste. This is written by Ed Frauenheim, who is a journalist with 15 years of experience writing about various work-related topics. There does not seem to be any bias in this article because Ed is an outsider looking at the data and merely interpreting it. This information is old (2005), but it’s useful for a project on technology and the workplace because it helps to support the point that employers should regulate the amount of time and the types of sites employees are allowed to use. This article gives evidence to refute the counterargument that freedom to surf the web actually supports more creativity.